Acentury

In telecom and networking environments, mobility operator testing is rarely a one-time activity. It’s continuous, repeated, and often time-sensitive, especially when changes are introduced into live or pre-production systems.

Whether validating a software upgrade, onboarding a new feature, evaluating tuning performance, or confirming stability after integration changes, the real challenge isn’t just having test cases available. It’s executing the right set of tests repeatedly, consistently, and at the right time, without creating a manual coordination burden.

Real-world testing is rarely “one test at a time.” Teams typically run regression suites, sanity sets, pre-release validations, or repeated stability runs. [Nazanin Nik, Acentury Product Manager]

This becomes particularly critical in environments such as:

• Operator labs validating new releases before deployment
• Network operations and engineering teams preparing rollout readiness checks
• System integration and verification teams validating multi-vendor components
• RAN / Core / Transport test teams running regression and stability campaigns
• Vendor teams and solution partners proving interoperability and readiness

Teams in these environments typically need to run:

• Regression suites after changes
• Repeated stability runs (sometimes dozens of cycles)
• Overnight or weekend test campaigns
• Pre-release acceptance validations under tight timelines

And the scale adds up quickly. A “simple” request like “run these 50 tests 20 times” is no longer just testing, it becomes an execution management problem:

• Selecting the correct set every time
• Ensuring repeatability and consistency
• Coordinating timing across teams and time zones
• Avoiding missed runs and manual errors
• Keeping progress moving even when people are offline

In other words, the friction shifts from engineering to operations. That’s where structured grouping and scheduling become essential. To address this, LAMTA focused on two capabilities foundational for scalable test execution:

• Grouping: the ability to bundle multiple test cases into a single reusable execution scope
• Scheduling: the ability to trigger execution at the right time, whether it’s one test, a set of tests, or a full grouped scope

Instead of handling 50+ tests individually, I grouped them into a single package representing the validation scope. That gave me a repeatable execution set, consistent coverage across runs, fewer manual steps, and a clearer workflow when communicating what was executed [Nazanin Nik, LAMTA Product Manager]

These capabilities reduce repetitive manual work, improve consistency, and allow execution to continue even outside working hours.

Real-World Impact: A Q&A with the Product Manager

LAMTA’s Product Manager, who helped design these features, faced a real-world challenge right before the holidays: an urgent project requiring more than 50 test cases, each executed 20 times. To manage this high-pressure scenario, the PM relied on Packaging and Scheduler. Here’s how it went:

Q: What are Packaging and Scheduler in LAMTA?

• A: They’re two features designed to make automated testing more scalable and manageable:
  • Packaging allows users to group multiple test cases into a single “package,” so they can be treated as one execution unit
  • Scheduler allows users to schedule execution for a single test case, multiple selected tests, or an entire package.

In short: Packaging organizes test execution, and Scheduler automates when execution happens.

Q: What user pain were you solving with Packaging?

• A: Real-world testing is rarely “one test at a time.” Teams typically run regression suites, sanity sets, pre-release validations, or repeated stability runs. Without Packaging, users spend time repeatedly selecting the same test cases, tracking them manually, and risking inconsistency. Packaging makes the workflow cleaner and repeatable: define the scope once, and reuse it whenever needed.

Q: Why did LAMTA need Scheduler? A: Automation alone isn’t enough if execution still depends on someone being online to trigger it. Scheduler solves operational bottlenecks like starting runs at specific times, executing outside working hours, repeating runs multiple times, and reducing manual involvement during high-pressure delivery periods. It turns test execution into a planned, controlled process.

Q: You mentioned you used these features in a high-pressure scenario. What was the situation? A: Right before the holidays, we had an urgent project requiring more than 50 test cases, each run 20 times. That’s a scenario where manual coordination becomes a risk: too much repetition, too many opportunities to miss something, and too much time spent triggering instead of analyzing.

Q: How did Packaging help you specifically? A: Packaging turned complexity into something manageable. Instead of handling 50+ tests individually, I grouped them into a single package representing the validation scope. That gave me a repeatable execution set, consistent coverage across runs, fewer manual steps, and a clearer workflow when communicating what was executed. Packaging made the execution scope “portable” and reusable.

Q: And Scheduler, what changed once you used it? A: Scheduler made the process sustainable. Instead of constantly triggering runs manually, I scheduled the executions and let LAMTA run them automatically in the background. Work continued even when I was offline or handling other urgent tasks. It’s exactly the outcome we aimed for: progress moves forward, even when life moments matter most.

Q: Who is this feature built for? A: Packaging and Scheduler are valuable for anyone running repeated testing cycles, but especially test engineers, release teams, and anyone needing repeatability, scheduling, and execution control. If you’ve ever said, “I need these same tests to run again reliably, without manual effort,” this feature is for you.

Q: What’s the biggest takeaway for users? A: The goal is simple: reduce manual overhead without reducing control. Packaging provides structure and consistency. Scheduler provides timing and automation. Together, they enable repeatable execution at scale. It’s not just about saving time; it’s about improving reliability and freeing teams to focus on results and decision-making.

LAMTA’s Product Manager reflects on the experience: when faced with 50+ test cases, each repeated 20 times, Packaging and Scheduler turned a stressful requirement into a manageable workflow. For the team - and personally - it proved that good automation doesn’t just improve engineering; it protects your time.

• To learn more about Acentury LAMTA: www.acentury.co/lamta
• We will be at MWC Barcelona 2026: Come join just in booth 7H45 in the Canadian/Ontario pavilion!
• To book a demo, contact us at info[at]acentury.co